View Single Post
Old 01-30-2008, 23:27 PM   #502 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,468
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by lwarmonger View Post
From what I've read, a significant number of Iranian citizens consider nuclear capability as a right and an issue of national sovereignty... that is a problem, because it means that nuclear power/weapons would be a hot issue in any elected government that was set up.
They can think whatever the hell they'd like, but if we simply won't allow it - and I and Podhoretz and dalem all agree that we should NEVER allow it - then it's simply going to remain an unrealized wish.

I agree that it DOES represent a problem in the abstract, as in, whatever they're determined to do and we're determined to prevent will remain a point of conflict. But this is really the bottom line: it comes down to WILL. If we are determined enough to prevent it - and we certainly SHOULD be - then we have the means to do so, and they do NOT have the means to assert their own will.

And that's independent of whether we have set up a puppet government or destroyed huge numbers of Iranians. We can deny them nukes for as long as we maintain the will to do so.

And we SHOULD.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote