Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman
Different question, I think. We're not talking about some sweeping startegic move here, affecting the tribal areas, or greater Pakistan, or the Muslim world. We're talking about doing what we're sworn to do: bring Osama to justice, or bring justice to Osama. No boots on the ground needed, presumably.
Look, this act, which you so flippantly dismiss as 'kill[ing] a few high level AQ/Taliban leaders' is rather more than that, and it is strategic in its implications all on its own, whether they're replaced or not (they will be of course). There are benefits both tangible and intangible for us doing what we said we'd do, and demonstrating both the capability and the will to do it.
|
Please explain ... "implications" which are ... what? (I ask at the risk of appearing entirely agnostic)... For sure we loose credebility if we DON'T "wack Waldo". I'm sure we are already being subjected to some rather raucous laughter.That being agreed upon...now further queries, in parts.
A) What happens if we DO, get the job done?
B) Who fills the void?
C) Where will the fight move? How much traction would we provide this anti west sentiment?