Quote:
|
Arabs in the West Bank in Hebron, massacred Jews and then all loaded them onto buses and expelled them. They're still settling on those people's land. Has that been rectified?
|
Well if what you call rectified is 400 Israelis getting practically half the city to themselves with a full army presence, then yes. A little more than rectified I would say..
Quote:
|
If Israeli Arabs were being attacked on shared highways very often, you bet your bottom dollar they'd demand themselves some segregated highways.
|
Wrong order of events I believe. Israel made segregated highways when the main conflict was between Israel and the PLO outside the territories (aka terrorist attacks by the PLO on airliners etc). The Palestinian population, while no doubt hating Israel, was not in active conflict with Israel in any serious way. Its possible I'm mistaken on that, but if you think so, please provide a source. Also, I suppose you are somehow going to argue that the Palestinians FORCED Israel to take the lion's share of their water leaving them with almost nothing for their own agriculture?
Quote:
|
I'm with you on the land trade, but if people want to push there being no Jews left in the Arab state, it sure as hell better go the other way around and absorb Arabs from Israel. Because the only real way to end an ethnic conflict is separation until those groups can start to overcome the mutual hatred of their parents. To those people in Ariel and Maaleh Adumim, that is their land and their home as far as they are concerned. There are people who have been born there and lived there their whole lives this generation. Telling them to go back to Israel proper is as foreign to them as telling West Bank Arabs to go back Jordan
|
So for the sake of revenge, you demand that the population exchange has to go both ways, even when there is no need for it? Israeli Arabs have done nothing to deserve expulsion, while Israeli settlers DO cause hardships for Palestinians both through their own actions and by the required IDF presence to protect them. I used to share your view of ethnic conflict, and if Israeli Arabs are willing to go for it or be bought out or whatever, fine. But I care about Israel maintaining its democracy, and one thing a democracy doesn't do is strip 20% of its inhabitants of citizenship and kick them out of the country.
I can see some justification for maintaining border settlements that can be easily geographically integrated into Israel (in exchange for a bit of Israeli territory), but look at Ariel on a map! It's location is ridiculous unless you want to prevent a Palestinian state from emerging at all. Maaleh Adumim prejudices negotiations on Jerusalem, essentially trying to establish before negotiations what should be determined during it. There is no sense in arguing that the settlements are simply neighbourhoods that just magically appeared out of nowhere. Many of the inhabitants are religious, but the tax breaks, cheap land deals, cheap water supplies, etc, are evidence that it was a political program from the beginning to make the West Bank Israeli forever. If you want to say it SHOULD be Israeli forever, fine, we've got a whole other argument. But if not, then any settlement that makes a Palestinian state impossible needs to go.