Thread: Huckabee
View Single Post
Old 01-21-2008, 03:43 AM   #60 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,758
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by FibrillatorD View Post
Yes, no need to keep repeating yourself. I state my acceptance yet again. That's obvious. Me get. Illegal, right.

Extralegal is not a fabrication. Every country has shantytowns, black markets, illegal societies. Extralegal sectors, where there may be trade, homes, families, even law and order, like in any other society, but all still technically illegal. Sometimes law enforcement can get everyone in line, many times enforcement won't solve the problem. We have a 12 million strong extralegal sector today where enforcement of drastic measures won't solve the problem, and THAT's what you twos won't recognize. AND there is a legal doctrine for dealing with it all. Preemption. We've employed it before. We can employ it again, although it would work much, much better if we got control of the border first.
It's not extralegal, it's ILLEGAL.

Extra means more. Extralegal means more legal. They are not more legal. They are ILLEGAL, as in not legal.

Stop inventing new words to mask criminality.


The article you sighted is completely irrelavent. If those people were criminals then they were guilty of stealing or squatting. They were not ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS that we're talking about here. They moved from one part of their own country into another part of their own country that they do not have ownership of. They did not move from one country into another country without using that country's official channel of entry.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

Last edited by gunnut : 01-21-2008 at 03:50 AM.
gunnut is online now   Reply With Quote