|
I never worked at the National Head Quarters, that's very true.
I know the G-36 was developed way later than the M4, and I never expressed otherwise. But any step forward for seomthing newer, better & more davanced is expensive, thats the general rule. Ofcourse how big an advance it will be to convert to a new product needs to be carefully considered, and perhaps then the better G-36 isn't worth the trouble. But the bottom line still is that the US needs to start thinking about a replacement. For now the AR-15 is doing its job well, but in the future higher tolerances are going to be a must.
Btw, what are your thoughts on moving over to a larger caliber std. assault rifle round, replacing the old 5.56x45 NATO ??
|