Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella
As for my comments on skill, that is very much what this is about. India is losing & they don't like it. Instrad of getting on with the game they are making excuses for their own failings. It is the loser's way.
.
|
You were down 130-6 and had Symonds been given out on any of the 3 occasions he was clearly out (as anyone watching the match would confirm) your total would have been nowhere near 463.The dismissals of Dravid and Ganguly- two batsmen who were set changed the course of the match.Had the Umpires been not blind you would have been beaten.
Genghis Khan was also a champion. sorry to say but Ponting looks very similar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella
And Latif, how on earth am I supposed to comment on something I haven't even seen? According to the description he dropped the ball & regathered it. When did this happen during the Sydney test?
.
|
If you would have watched the replays , Ponting took a catch, grounded the ball immediately , but still appealed .Very similar to what latif did
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella
One thing strikes me, however. Mike Proctor was the match referee then as he is now. There have been clear implacations in the comments of many posters here that Proctor is biased in his ruling in Sydney. If so, why would you use one of his judgements as an example? If he was biased against Harbhajan, why not Latif? This is the problem, you see, when logic is abandoned in favour of fevered conspiracy theories.
.
|
I quote this example to show that rules are for asians only.