Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
I keep shaking my head at this kind of thinking. Basically, you want to win the peace without winning the war. The question is if your leaders failed at war, then what makes you think that they will be any better winning over your enemies in peace?
|
Which part? Not wanting the "headache of fighting in FATA", or my opposition to "forcing change"?
PS; I am just bouncing ideas off - I am in no way suggesting that I am sold on the strategy I have outlined, nor do I have any love or liking for the Taliban and their ilk.