|
Anyhow, to respond to the OP: I think that while he may go off the deep end in condemning Bush as the David Irving of the White House, he is essentially correct. But so was Bush. Bush has responsibilities to our nation and its troops that have to come before international condemnations and reprisals or what-have-you. Bush has a job to do, like it or not, and if it was pragmatic to backtrack on this matter at this time, well, that's what we pay him for. I am saying that, as unfortunate as it might be, the President of the United States' opinions on humanity play second fiddle to what is right for the country.
I dont know if Bush was/is right or wrong. What I do know is that he wouldn't change his mind about anything if there wasn't a very good reason (very good reason to his mind, of course).
|