View Single Post
Old 10-23-2007, 22:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
wabpilot
Military Professional
 
wabpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-05-03
Location: Commuting between Dresden and Ft. Worth
Posts: 558
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxor View Post
Wab Not being an aerospace engineer I can't say for certain but judging from looks don't most things "fly" better than the F-4 did/does? It looks like it has very little when it comes to glide ratio and controlability without power.
In slow flight, the F-4 is a challenge. Its stall characteristics are brutal and it will flat spin with minimal provocation. An engine out, is more than enough to provoke a flat spin. Thus, speed management is vital. That being said, I liked flying the F-4. It's slow speed control was better than the F-14. No PIO at all. I never was concerned about a ramp strike in the F-4, that was a constant concern in the F-14. At altitude, the F-4 had the power to explore parts of the envelope where test pilots should go on their own. The F-14 does not. Fortunately the overtemp sensor on the F-4's armored windscreen usually kept people out of trouble. (Certain maintenance test pilots, notwithstanding.)

I would call the F-14 more refined than the F-4. The F-18 is just in another league. It's got to be the best flying fighter ever. It is more than a refinement on the F-14. It was coming into the fleet as I was leaving. I never qualed, but I did make it to F-18 maintenance school. It's no wonder the thing is so great. It is built by people who want you to fix it and make it fly again real quick.
wabpilot is offline   Reply With Quote