View Single Post
Old 10-14-2007, 00:50 AM   #273 (permalink)
Officer of Engineers
Military Professional
Moderator
Scotch taster
 
Join Date: 08-06-03
Posts: 16,674
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buu View Post
I believe your problematic anger stems from within America's hypocritical standards. Contrary to the work of Khan, the CIA has outdone everybody in giving Iran the blueprints to build these bombs.

The Russian, who had defected to the US years earlier, still couldn't believe the orders he had received from CIA headquarters. The CIA had given him the nuclear blueprints and then sent him to Vienna to sell them - or simply give them - to the Iranian representatives to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

George Bush insists that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. So why, six years ago, did the CIA give the Iranians blueprints to build a bomb? | Special reports | Guardian Unlimited
Do you not read your own links? The CIA provided a flawed implosion device, designed to fizzle. AQ Khan provided a DF-2 warhead device.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buu View Post
It's rather simple, really, and the commotion through your caps lock is very distasteful and unnecessary. The only way a way can be "legal" through today's standards is if it meets these two demands: it is a direct retaliatory response to an attack (which Iraq wasn't - Afghanistan allegedly was); or, the war is authorized by the United Nations (which it wasn't). Failing to qualify for either standard, one can only say the war was completely illegal.
WRONG! There is ONLY one way for a war to be ILLEGAL and that is for the UN to declare it so. Check the Krajina Invasion, I was there. The UN said squat all. Check the Chechnya Invasion. The UN said squat all. Check the Sino-Vietnam Wars. The UN said squat all. Check the Sino-Soviet clashes. The UN said squat all. NONE OF THESE ACTIONS WERE ILLEGAL!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buu View Post
They said that about 'Nam, remember? And you really shouldn't be so dependent on limited thinking. Iran doesn't need to have top tier military weaponry or technology; the street thugs in Iraq has caused the "strongest" country in the world to be subject to global humiliation, hundreds of billions of dollars, and a crumbling economy.
WHAT GLOBAL HUMILATION? The US is still in Iraq and as current evidence shows, the Iraqis are now turning to US forces just to get on with the basis of day-to-day living. Shia may now hate Sunni but at least US forces are allowing them to trade with each other.

And again, you are ABSOLUTELY WRONG Iran has the largest military. She can't even decide actions in Iraq wheras the Americans can.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buu View Post
You seem to think that the sole purpose of Iran (or any anti-American movement) is to defeat the US's military. We recognize America's firepower, but also recognize how incompetent their holders are. While you are killing men with outdated Russian rifles, they are killing your soldiers and your economy. Losses through war come in many shapes and size; lives are not the only thing America is losing right now.
Losing what? Just how old are you? I've lived through the Vietnam War. I've lived through the Sino-Vietnam Wars. I've lived through the Soviet-Afghan War and in all cases, the "looser" emerged stronger than before. Even the USSR though her collapse had nothing to do with Afghan War.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buu View Post
Seems to be a plan that's functioning rather well, if I do say so myself. The US is embarrassing itself - so much so that, other nations are being spoken over America for the title of superpower.
Let me get this straight - embarrassment = defeat?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Buu View Post
If I can get banned on WorldAffairsBoard.com for stating my opinion which is different than your's, then let me know, because I will gladly show myself the door.
You're welcome to leave anytime you want BUT you are NOT welcome to spill your bullcrap that we've spent over 10,000 posts debating upon to which you have NOT bother to read.

It is one thing to offer your opinion up to for challenge but it is quite another to come into our home telling us we don't know crap when we have read have your crap before and proven it wrong ... and continue to do so.
__________________
Chimo

Last edited by Officer of Engineers : 10-14-2007 at 10:31 AM.
Officer of Engineers is offline   Reply With Quote