View Single Post
Old 10-12-2007, 14:40 PM   #259 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,520
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis View Post
bluesman,



theoretical question at this point, because it hasn't happened, and in any case i am honestly not sure about the answer.

what happens if in the pursuit of the first, the second is set back?

or vice-versa?
An EXCELLENT question, and it has been an unknown how the vast majority of Iranians would react to an outright attack on the regime.

Personally, I think that the mass of ethnic Persions WOULD rally to the only nationalist answer available: the mullahs. BUT...

Our hope would be for the fracture of Iran as a monolithic whole into the huge ethnic problems they've managed to keep the lid on by repression. I think that it is very likely that Iran, riven as it is by identity politics, would not be capable of a truly united effort to hold itself together.

But this is simply a secondary question, because what we know, past any sort of a doubt, is that an unmolested Iran WILL proceed in a linear fashion straight to nuclear weaponry.

And whatever difficulties there may be to the only viable solution to that problem there is can only be cosidered of secondary importance.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote