|
What matters to ME, ole buddy, is that he's an ill-informed incendiary troll and master baiter. He hasn't got decent facts to back an indecent claim; he's a thumb-sucking juvenile that is here to scream invective and wipe excrement on the wall, like he was a brain-damaged oafish child - which he seems to enjoy playing that role.
So, as far as which number is correct being the esoterica of politicians' arguments, from my point-of-view, his intention was always absolutely clear: to attempt in his own lame way to bring disrepute on a worthy goal by falsely claiming that the cost is too high for the people that will ultimately benefit. This is a value judgement, and, as this low-rent noodge HAS no values, it was a clear attempt to influence those among us that don't know the facts into thinking he had a legimately-produced, universally-accepted set of facts observed by dispassionate scientific minds that proved the point. Well, he has no such thing.
I'm telling you, this guy is no more than a poor shadow of Broken's and lulldapull's bastard child.
Take my word for it: he will be as hard to find at the WAB as it would be going to an NRA Convention to find an al Qaeda supporter (who would likely be twice as clean, ten times as smart and only half as anti-American as THIS yutz.) He'll go too far, as wild-eyed maniacs always do when they're raving about whatever their pet psychosis happens to be, and get banned. I've got a GREAT record of predicting these flame-outs; he's our next one.
And none too soon, either.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell
|