Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
Well, I don't really have time to teach you all about the NPT, you could try reading it. There are numerous ways a signatory can be in breach of it. Read the legal brief I posted the link to to see the ways in which the US and UK are in breach of it as examples.
|
I've read that thing in full and you obviously have not.
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
The fact remains that obtaining materials that could be preparatory to starting a nuclear weapons program is a breach.
Starting a nuclear weapons program is a breach, albeit in a different way.
But they are VERY different things.
|
How about operating cascades in complete secrecy away from IAEA accounting and obtaining weapons grade plutonium or did that part escape your attention?
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
Again, please substantiate the reference. Otherwise you're just some guy saying stuff.
If you can't substantiate either, shall we move on?
|
Your legislature says it's legal. Only your court can overrule them. They have not. This challenge was brought forth in 2004. It's now 2007. It went nowhere. Yes, shall we move on? Or is logic too strong a point for you?
And read the MDA for crying out loud, it involves NO transfer of nukes, nor even nuclear warhead designs. Warhead specifications is not the same thing. The Brits will need that info for conventional warheads as well.