Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
You're seriously joking me! What to you think the NPT is all about?
|
Well, I don't really have time to teach you all about the NPT, you could try reading it. There are numerous ways a signatory can be in breach of it. Read the legal brief I posted the link to to see the ways in which the US and UK are in breach of it as examples.
The fact remains that obtaining materials that could be preparatory to starting a nuclear weapons program is a breach.
Starting a nuclear weapons program is a breach, albeit in a different way.
But they are VERY different things.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
Oh please! Your courts as well as ours AND your justice ministry (whatever they may be called) would have gone over the legal wording of any treaty with a fine tooth comb. If your courts have decided not to hear a case that was obviously brought forth as late as 2004, then it is deemed to have no merit. Courts dismisses motionless lawsuits all the time.
|
Again, please substantiate the reference. Otherwise you're just some guy saying stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Officer of Engineers
As for the US Supreme Court, I've found no motion submitted to them on the above.
|
If you can't substantiate either, shall we move on?