Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
What we're saying is this - There is absolutely no proof, whatsoever, that there is an Iranian weapons program. Being in violation of the NPT, and having a weapons program, are 2 very, VERY different things.
|
You're seriously joking me! What to you think the NPT is all about?
Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
That's a counter? Gee, you're struggling  Let's say that we had a supreme court. Which we don't. But let's say we did. Are you saying that "la la la la we're not listening" is a legal endorsement? Please say you are.
As always, could you also substantiate the above claim regarding the US Supreme court and their refusal to hear it. And the same for our non-existent supreme court. I'm not trying to catch you out. I've already learned a lot on this board, and I'm still learning. Long may it continue. |
Oh please! Your courts as well as ours AND your justice ministry (whatever they may be called) would have gone over the legal wording of any treaty with a fine tooth comb. If your courts have decided not to hear a case that was obviously brought forth as late as 2004, then it is deemed to have no merit. Courts dismisses motionless lawsuits all the time.
As for the US Supreme Court, I've found no motion submitted to them on the above.