Quote:
Originally Posted by timhaughton
I've seen much use of non sequitur arguments, along the lines of "Iran has these blueprints, therefore they must be building a bomb" etc. When I reject them as illogical conclusions, people get upset. That's OK though.
I guess everyone is here to have their views enforced and backed up, not challenged. That's OK too. Perhaps an online support group would be better for you guys instead of a "discussion" forum. That way, your views would never be challenged.
|
Yeah,
Well it seems that our views are backed by something called facts
"Article II of the NPT
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices."
So tell me, how is buying a warhead plan NOT a violation of the NPT?