Thread: About NGFS
View Single Post
Old 09-14-2007, 22:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,274
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Smitty View Post
The USMC has stated a near-term, threshold/objective range requirement of 76km/117km (41nm/63nm) for NGFS.
So even if we reactivate the battleships, their poor range won't satisfy the Marine's demand?

Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Smitty View Post
The M777 has a max range of 40km with assisted projectiles. The AGS with LRLAP will have a max range of 153km. So there's a bit of a difference in capability here.
That is very true. But the AGS costs a lot more. While the M777 might have short range, it's on par with the Iowa's main gun, and cheaper to operate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by B.Smitty View Post
The AGS also has a sustained rate of fire of 10rnds/min, which no US Army system can do (short of the canceled Crusader).
Can we just pack a few more tubes onto a ship or send 2 LCS with 2 tubes each instead of a single DDX? It'll probably be cheaper to develop and operate.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote