Quote:
Originally Posted by Tagwyn
People: I do not agree with your assesment of the need to have forces in either Korea or EU. If there is no need for them to be there ... take them home. They are not any more needed than **** on a boar! There is no threat from E. Europe or Russia. To heck with contracts with W. Gernany. Those folks believe they had better troops than ours and only lost because of the Red Army. My brother spent 3 years in Germany and heard this drivel all the time. Ramstein AFB should remain.
Kim will not attack because of the US fleet. He has been warned not to test our resolve. If the cowardly, ignorant Kool-aide drinkers win the next election, all bets are off. ROK forces are actually more than suffiecent to repel the red army of N.K. with the help of our fleet. Additionally, China would not approve such a move and would probably activly resist such nonsense. Tag
|
Kim has tons of heavy artillery aimed at Seoul, infiltration forces and quite a big army that is taught to survive on it's own by plundering and stealing. I've read about the determination of KPA troops, and ravenous is a good word to describe them.
Oh yes and I don't want to think about the possiblity of Korean nuclear artillery
NATO may need a refurbishment, but I doubt it will happen. and if it will not happen, the US can't just break treaty and pull out.