View Single Post
Old 09-09-2007, 16:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,243
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stan187 View Post
Published in June by Yale University Press, the Israeli duo's book asserted that the Soviets flew sorties over Dimona in the still-experimental and top-secret Foxbats both to bolster a deliberate Soviet effort to encourage Israel to launch a war, and to ensure that the nuclear target could be effectively destroyed once Israel, branded an aggressor for its preemption, came under a planned joint Arab-Soviet counterattack.

Soviet nuclear-missile submarines were said to have been poised off Israel's shore, ready to strike back in case Israel already had a nuclear device and sought to use it. The Soviets were also said to have geared up for a naval landing on Israel's beaches.
very intresting, .. my past studies on the six days war does confirm the Russian provocation was a the trigger of war, if not the main trigger. Even, a Soviet fabricated report of Israeli divisions massing near the Syrian border was thrown at the PM by the Soviet ambassador.

One point though, based on what I have read Soviet and indeed the American completely wrote off the possiblity of Soviet landing and possibility of conventional naval attack, sense and I quote from the book Arms for Arabs "The Soviet Black Sea Fleet did not have a non-nuclear attacking force".

But whatever the Soviet intention was in this great imperial scheme of theirs, it totally misfired.
__________________
If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote