|
If Britannia is incorrect, then of course, one cannot debate or clear the cobwebs
It is generally accepted as the most well researched source.
Wikipedia is incorrect, Britannia is incorrect, then who is correct?
And who is to agree whatever link is being given is correct or incorrect; after all someone may have an axe to grind!
There has to be some baseline.
__________________
"Some have learnt many Tricks of sly Evasion, Instead of Truth they use Equivocation, And eke it out with mental Reservation, Which is to good Men an Abomination."
I don't have to attend every argument I'm invited to.
HAKUNA MATATA
Last edited by Ray : 09-03-2007 at 17:01 PM.
|