Thread: Ea-6b / Ea-18g
View Single Post
Old 09-02-2007, 22:10 PM   #11 (permalink)
wabpilot
Military Professional
 
wabpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-05-03
Location: Commuting between Dresden and Ft. Worth
Posts: 558
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JA Boomer View Post
I am interested in why you specifically are wary of discussing the "strike" mission?
Strike missions call for the use of special weapons which may or may not have been aboard our carriers. Beyond confirming that the F-4B and F-4J were subject to SALT I, II and START limitations, I don't intend to discuss it. Everything else I know is classified. It would take me longer than I care to look up an open source for anything I wanted to write about.

Quote:
The point I am trying to make with all this, is that with the multi-role fighters that are the standard these days, it does not make sense for an aircraft to fulfill the "light attack" or "medium strike" role. The light/medium/heavy designations may signify the warload or range, but I don't see any reason to label an aircraft with an attack/strike/interdiction mission, as they will probably do all of these plus more.
You may not see the point, but then you are not BUAER. They specified a light attack aircraft. Thus, you are stuck with their set of specifications.
wabpilot is offline   Reply With Quote