Thread: Ea-6b / Ea-18g
View Single Post
Old 08-28-2007, 02:13 AM   #2 (permalink)
wabpilot
Military Professional
 
wabpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: 12-05-03
Location: Commuting between Dresden and Ft. Worth
Posts: 558
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JA Boomer View Post
However, it seems to me that the Navy is also losing in a few categories. There are currently 2 electronic warfare officers in the Prowler, and I believe the copilot also helps out in this respect during missions. In the EA-18G, there is only one man running all the equipment, and the pilot will more than likely have his hands full most of the time. Reducing the manning from 2.5 to 1 in the electronic attack profile seems like a capability loss to me. Or maybe the new avionics and hardware can make up for this?
Automation is the difference. The slightly more modern EF-111 had only one operator. The EF-18G is considerably more modern than the avionics suite in the EF-111.

Quote:
Also, there’s a big decrease in mission radius when going from the EA-6B to the EA-18G.
Inflight refueling. No strike package is going without it these days.

Quote:
Is it just me, or in the Navy's quest for a Super Hornet nest of a carrier wing, have they lost some of the best features of the current platform. The Navy is gaining in a lot of areas no questions, but the reduced crew and lack of range would seem to impair the EA-18G in its role. Thoughts?
If you mean that more availablility is a bad thing, then the EF-18 is definitely a bad idea. Right now, the EA-6 takes multible manhours of service and maintenance per flight hour. Whereas the EA-18G should reduce that significantly. If experience with the F-18E/F is any guide, the difference will be the same as having half again as many aircraft.

Quote:
Also, tactical fighters have become faster, more maneuverable, more lethal, yet their combat ranges seem to be dropping. I know the F-111 and A-6 were attack aircraft, but they had some monster ranges. Why is it that modern fighters like the F/A-18 seem to struggle with mission radius, or is that all in my head?

Thanks, Boomer
The F/A-18 is NOT a replacement for the A-6 or F-111. The latter are medium attack aircraft. The F/A-18 is a light attack type. The F-18E/F is the medium attack aircraft of the near term, until the F-35C arrives. Do not attempt to compare light attack with medium. Different missions, different specifications.

Last edited by wabpilot : 08-28-2007 at 02:17 AM.
wabpilot is offline   Reply With Quote