View Single Post
Old 07-24-2007, 15:21 PM   #5 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 10,193
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reo690 View Post
Most of the comments support Global Warming, and use the same argument, scientists agree, scientists agree.
They left out a few words.

It should have been "some" scientists agree...

I noticed that in global warming propaganda on the History Channel and the Discovery Channel. They say "scientists agree" as if ALL the scientists agree on this one concept. You can never get everyone to agree on the same unproven concept. Those shows will be less of a propaganda if they said "some scientists agree" and then present the other side of the argument. So far, on all those nature shows, I have heard word one on the other side of the opinion.

Here's a prime example. Ever heard that scientists believe drinking a glass of red wine is good for the body? When I see a show talking about the benefits of red wine, it also presents the other side of the argument. A small segment of the show will say "this is only a correlation between healthy people and drinking red wine...there are many other reasons for this result...here they are..."

I never see that objectivity on global warming propaganda.
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.

Last edited by gunnut : 07-24-2007 at 15:24 PM.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote