I invite you to join the "Swift Sword" camp of dissemblance. That salafism/wahabbism run rife in S.A. is of little doubt. That the S.A. extended royal family may have had a "hidden" hand in the development and distraction of Saudi-based extremist ideology, particularly during the Soviet-Afghan war is clear.
But despite the reasonable assumption that the S.A. royal family may have over-played their desire to project these radical undesirables elsewhere, I've yet to see any indication by Swift Sword, you, or anybody else of the active participation of agencies of the Saudi kingdom in the recruiting, arming, training, and facilitation of movement to the Iraqi war-zone with the expressed intent of engaging our forces.
Care to weigh your patchwork quilt of innuendo against the amassed evidence directly pointed at the al-Quds elements within Pasdaran? I reinterate that both of you need to explicitly separate the effect of a trans-national pan-Islamic movement from the activities of state-sponsored terrorism. To date I've not seen the same compelling linkages which are so readily apparent with Iran.
Finally, your article fails to account for fully 30% of the foreign insurgents within Iraq. Who are they-Americans, Brits, and others from the west? If so, are these nations (including my own) encouraging aspiring
irhabists citizens to the Iraqi killing fields?
Hmmm...Didn't GWB say something about fighting them there so that we don't have to fight them here? Seems like everybody agrees, including the Saudis, and are donating their resident miscreants to the slaughterhouse. I guess
that must be working, eh?
