View Single Post
Old 07-12-2007, 19:15 PM   #32 (permalink)
pdf27
Contributor
 
pdf27's Avatar
 
Join Date: 06-05-06
Location: UK
Posts: 538
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
I have the Flight Manuals and the Operating Data Manuals for the type. Without revealing what the actual figures are, suffice it to say that they were (and are) firmly sub-sonic.
Ummm... you'll have to forgive me being a little sceptical on that one. If something can do 0.95 Mach at 20,000ft there is no fundamental aerodynamic reason it isn't supersonic under the right conditions. Controllability is a minor issue, but one that I'd be stunned if they didn't fix during the flight test programme.

Incidentally, those manuals remind me of the pilot's notes for a glider I once flew. One part went something like this:
Quote:
This aircraft is non-aerobatic and must not be looped.
Minimum loop entry speed is 85 knots
Scurrilous rumours that I've personally verified this speed are of course quite untrue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by glyn View Post
Armament Pracice camp, late summer 1958. Good deduction!
Not hard given the mark of Hunter involved. Late summer 1958 makes it one of the very last B-36s, with most of the rest already retired.
__________________
Rule 1: Never trust a Frenchman
Rule 2: Treat all members of the press as French
pdf27 is offline   Reply With Quote