Quote:
Originally Posted by uss
TM,
It might be able to cruise with that kind of load, but what ACM where the a/c will really be put to the test. I mean think in terms of manouvering to break lock.
|
As Jimmy just mentioned, no manouvering with tanks and bombs, just missiles. I think that can be said of any aircraft, with the possible exception of the F-22 whose monster engines might negate weight issues to a degree.
On AMRAAM C-5, I think it is odd that MOD didn`t go for C-7, which is said to be a big improvement over C-5? The "D" or C-8 version with extended range will be in production in December 2007, is a supposed Meteor rival so I can see why the RAF didn`t opt for it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by uss
I'm no pilot but it sounds right - considering its delta design and incredible TWR. In fact, i'd give the EF2000 a slight advantage WVR at least in terms of first look considering how BIG the MKI is. Of course, the MKI has 4 eyes, which could nullify that advantage. However, in the BVR dept, I'd give first look/fire advantage to the MKI (thats IMHO) along with its ability to leave the fight and reengage as per convenience.
|
Not sure who would have an edge BVR, if we believe the hype about CAPTOR and N011-M Bars, they will both see each other before AWACS does!!! I know the "users" have been impressed with CAPTOR. A BVR fight though is not just about radar, it`s about energy state, defensive aids, good IFF! (an oxymoron!).
I do wonder about the sensor fusion in the Su-30 MKI though having it`s systems "cobbled" together so to speak compared to the kit in Typhoon which is all automated, I wonder if the lighter workload for the Typhoon pilot negates the help the WSO can give to the fight in the big Su?
ARCHER, that Damocles pod looks a nice piece of kit! Litening III for the Typhoon will be ready in the next few months I hear, ready for the `Stan after that!
