View Single Post
Old 06-23-2007, 14:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,884
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by joey View Post
50000 Tonnes and nuke propulsion is useless IMHO. why the hell to go for nuke propulsion with 50k tonnes displacement only?
What does displacement have to do with choosing nuclear propulsion? The de Gaulle displaces 38,000 tons light. The Kirovs were 29,000 tons, and the US built plenty of nuclear powered cruisers. The reasons for using nuclear have more to do with endurance, especially at high speed. A nuclear powered ship can go much, much further without replenishment of supplies, as well.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote