View Single Post
Old 06-22-2007, 20:21 PM   #6 (permalink)
ArmchairGeneral
Devil's Advocate
Senior Contributor
 
ArmchairGeneral's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-03-06
Location: The boonies of NC, USA.
Posts: 2,883
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGTharos View Post
You can basically forget about SAMs targetting F-22's at any 'long' distance, barring a SAM armed with a nuclear warhead.

As for thrust to weight? The F-15C can have 1.4 or so when it's fairly low on fuel ... the Streak had 1.6. The Strike already beats the C and matches the Streak's performance figures closely enough, IIRC.

The F-22 takes it all away again ... in other words ... you mis-calculated
No kidding. IIRC, the Raptor's engines have nearly 40,000 lbs of thrust on burner. Each. And it weighs, what, 55 or 60 thousand lbs with a combat load? Compared to an an Eagle, with around 25,000 lbs per engine, and about 50,000 lbs combat load, or about 30,000 lbs/engine and I think something like 60,000 lbs combat load.

I don't know of a fighter that can match the Raptor for sheer brute power.
__________________
"Apocalyptic thought is curiously pleasurable."
-Theodore Dalrymple
ArmchairGeneral is offline   Reply With Quote