Quote:
Originally Posted by killabee
My point was that LUFTWAFFE did not engage her full strenght against USAF so the succes of usaf in europe should take this in consideration.
|
Semantics. War is never fair. The Luftwaffe threw what it had into the fight, and if they had put their full force, America would have thrown 3X that number as well. It was not subject to a strategic campaign either. So you tell me, who had the better plan and who won?
Quote:
The use of american fighters by IAF in combat shows that the israeli airforce has a beter mastery of that technology than the Americans.
Yes, war is not fair and numbers make the diference, but also pilots do...
|
The IAF has had opponents who punch below their weight. The USAF prepared for WWIII, not the uber fighter jock tactical battles the Israelis excelled in. And American pilots can be every bit as good as Israeli ones, this is just internet hubris that Israelis are the best etc.
Technology? You have to be kidding!! Who made those fighters?? The US!!
Who owns the technology for the most hard parts- like the engine?? The US!!
Who makes the most advanced fighter in the world, today- the F22A? The US...
Who can even seriously claim that the Israelis are better than the Americans? The Israelis are competent, and make good stuff, but the US is by far the leader when it comes to overall ability!!