Quote:
Originally Posted by Big K
to all WAB members,
this is a very good exemple of what i' ve sad at the last post.
2 questions:
1- Death of Hrant Dink served who? to the Turkish Govt.? or Turkish nationalists?? having all this negative reactions from all around the world...why??
clearly it was not served to Turks...not at all. so why to kill him? and a better question who killed him?..
who have a profit from the death of Hrank Dink?..
|
Who profits from Article 301?
Article 301 states the following.
A person who
publicly denigrates Turkishness, the Republic or the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and three years.
A person who
publicly denigrates the Government of the Republic of Turkey, the judicial institutions of the State, the military or security organizations shall be punishable by imprisonment of between six months and two years.
In cases where denigration of Turkishness is committed by a Turkish citizen in another country the punishment shall be increased by one third.
Expressions of thought intended to criticize shall not constitute a crime.
Quote:
|
yes you have your answer...
|
That the Turkish government is scared of freedom of speech.
Quote:
|
Article 301 is just a exemple of numerous other similar laws in many European law books. In French, German, Swiss etc. laws theres too many similar or same laws...
|
Name and list one.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by big k
on the other hand Mr. Hrant Dink was a relative to one of my Armenian friend named Nubar. we are sharing the same net house, playing and enjoying the same things...we are like brothers, calling eachother "bro"
as for 100 years somebody trying to plant seeds of hatred between us but no way...
|
I have and grew up with African-American cousins, therefore slavery
never existed.