View Single Post
Old 04-25-2007, 23:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Wraith601
Title Classified
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 1,144
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasman View Post
A VLS system for ESSM would be valuable and the GD site lists the Mk41 as an example of a system that is capable of being installed. I agree with you re the 76mm gun. Space and weight is provided for up to 32 VLS cells (4x8), 8 Harpoon canisters (2x4) and 2 x Phalanx CIWS.

http://www.gdlcs.com/documents/MMC-Brochure.pdf

Cheers
Granted I'm not a naval engineer, but I would have included a Mk 41 VLS forward, just aft of the gun. In addition to the increase in firepower the ESSm would bring (in all configurations, not just with a special AAW module) the weight of the VLS would help offset the weight of mission modules. There are concerns that the ship will be "rear heavy' and this could cause structural problems down the road. Fitting a 76 mm gun would also help this problem as well.
__________________
"We always have been, we are, and I hope that we always shall be, detested in France."
-Sir Arthur Wellesley
Wraith601 is offline   Reply With Quote