Asim, I find it very difficult to believe that you're speaking a theoretical sense.
You have made the following statements in the past in reference to using nuclear weapons against Israel:
Quote:
|
They have a pretty much hostile appraoch with everyone. Hostile enough to give lethal blows to them. I'd say it'd make our lives easier without them around.
|
Quote:
|
What if the Middle Easterners don't want to give Israel a retaliatory option. Launch multiple bombs, get done with Israel, none of our countrymen died. Only Israelis, whats so bad about that?
|
Quote:
|
Killing 15-20 million people to save a 1.3 billion of us? That's a bargain.
|
Quote:
But, say Israel's a lot more capable of killing more humans in the middle east than the humans on Israel.
So whoever shoots first, wins. Why wait for Israel to actually launch a nuke.
Say one guy from Hezbollah, one guy from Hamas, one Wahabbi, one Taliban one some other militant each goes and blows something off in Israel.
So now is it our solemn duty to bend over to Israel and get things in our nations pulverized? Shouldn't we just blow them up and call it a day?
|