Quote:
Originally Posted by brokensickle
That's a cyber 'tickle me elmo'. I shall employ it.
By the way. Did you read my response to the article? Did you get a similar impression as to the deceptive nuances contained in it?
Ivan
|
I was interested how they were able to point the finger at increased dust storms while avoiding why they may be occurring.
I remember Dalem mentioning the increasing temperature on Mars a year ago in a discussion about solar radiance, one of the reasons I decided to withhold any further support for the 'global warming/CO2 emissions' bandwagon.
That and a chat with a scientist who stayed with us when he returned from Antarctica after extracting more ice cores. He was going to withhold the results of the research he was undertaking 'for a few years' because his findings didn't suit the current 'hysteria' (his word).
P.S. I'm quite prepared to accept that the Mars' warming is caused by an increased frequency of dust storms, as this would be a natural consequence of increased solar radiance.