|
Hang on. I just realized I’ve already provided a fair portion of evidence.
There was the article about how anthropogenic CO2 and Sulfur emissions are significantly greater than volcanic emissions.
Plus the Met Office: Climate Change Myths link. Written in that annoying Myth vs Fact format which doesn’t really help anyone, but still provides a good summary of the case in support of human influenced climate change.
Then a post laying out how the supposedly debunked ‘hockey stick’ graph has been replicated and its methodology passing peer review.
Sure nothing conclusive, but Evolution hasn’t been conclusively proven either.
Certainly enough information has been presented to at least support the possibility of human emissions being responsible for climate change.
If you choose to support the view that human emissions are not contributing to climate change that is fine. However to suggest that no EVIDENCE has been provided is misleading.
Evidence has been provided for both sides of the argument (though more of an introductory nature for further research). It is then simply a question of personal interpretation.
__________________
"Just go home rednecks!" Me, 28/03/2007
|