Thread: 300
View Single Post
Old 03-25-2007, 14:01 PM   #71 (permalink)
Kansas Bear
WAB Resident Historian
Senior Contributor
 
Kansas Bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: 07-01-06
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 1,507
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by xerxes View Post
Based on your question, which was: "The question is, what country benefits from there NOT being a pipeline transporting Turkmenistan and Kazakistan's oil to the world market??": in my opinion that implies Iran, because it would mean that it has to pass through Iran ... if anything. more leverage for the Iranians. You say, not Iran, then who? ...
The majority of Turkmenistan and Kazakistan's oil flows through Russia. Giving Russia political and economical power over those two countries.

Quote:
just a wild guess, ... TURKEY
LOL

Quote:
just kidding, anyways seeing that Taliban was on ISI's leash, u might be refering to that nation. Which however still has to pass the pipeline through its territory, which would make it pointless.
True.



Quote:
You are absolutly right, in what you are saying and you have no argument from me, however, i was talking about the summer of 2001, when the relation between the US government and Talian was already soured on the issue. That was my point. I was not refering to few years back, to what led it to that. Though, I am very curious of whom according to you spilled the beans ...
I don't have any concrete evidence, just my own deductions. Although, the deaths of certain people have given some credence to my suspicions.
Kansas Bear is offline   Reply With Quote