View Single Post
Old 03-13-2007, 17:25 PM   #44 (permalink)
Gun Grape
Resident Curmudgeon
Military Professional
 
Gun Grape's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-12-05
Location: Panama City Fl
Posts: 2,884
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
That's my impression of the vehicle. Overly complex. It would be awesome if it works out well. But if not, it's a lot of wasted time and money chasing a mechanical perfection.
I hate the EFV/AAAV. When I saw the first powerpoint on it 10 yrs ago, I thought they were trying to do to much.

Quote:
Why not seperate them into 2 vehicles? One for land operation and another one the 25 knot capable LCV that can get the EFV to the beach.
Because you loose landing areas. A LCU can beach at about 10% of the worlds coastline. An Amtrack around 35% and an LCAC around 70%.

So it is easier for the enemy to figure out where you can land and create a better defence, if you only have LCUs.

Quote:
Sometimes the ideal solution is not the practical solution. Igor Sikorsky succeeded where everyone else had failed because he used a practical solution when everyone ese was trying for the ideal solution.
The thought going around the Corps at the time was "If it works then it changes the way we operate." An AAv really isn't much more than a big, covered WW2 LVT.
Gun Grape is offline   Reply With Quote