Thread: 300
View Single Post
Old 03-09-2007, 20:02 PM   #7 (permalink)
xerxes
Padishah Shahanshah
Senior Contributor
 
xerxes's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-23-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,241
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blademaster View Post
There's no way in hell that there was a million man army at that time. It would be simply too unsustainable to support by sea. Persia just did not have the capacity to feed & clothe & arm a million man army by sea or even by land.

A more believable number would be less than 100,000. Hell I think that's way too high if a 300 man force can hold that contigent for so long. I would say it was around 25000 to 35000 total with 10 000 facing against 300 and the rest supporting forces or diverted somewhere else.

It is as Kenny said, the concept of a million man army was Greek of saying that it was very big. Arabs equally had the same ways, but they didnot use a million, rather used fourscore. So everything was four time bigger than theirs.

As far as million-man army in general, back than it was impossible, only in 1812 did the barrier came close to be broken when Napoleon invaded Russia with 650,000-man Grand Armee. Even then his genuis could not transfered into physical world without the invention of wireless communication, which characterize the million-man armies of Franco-Prussian war and the Great War. It was the the mass-conscription of French Revolution followed with wirless radio some a century later that dawned the age of million-man armies.
__________________
If we contrast the rapid progress of this mischievous discovery of gunpowder with the slow and laborious advances of reason, science, and the arts of peace, a philosopher, according to his temper, will laugh or weep at the folly of mankind. - Edward Gibbon
xerxes is offline   Reply With Quote