Quote:
Originally Posted by JBG
We operated a carrier from the end of WW2 to the end of the Vietnam War. Only one carrier at a a time but we have operated fixed wing carriers.
We had signed up for a British "through deck cruiser" but the Falklands War convinved the RN that they should keep the carrier in question ( HMS Invinvible? ). In this context I must admit that whilst I was aware of the proposal to buy a carrier, I have not been able to find out what we would put on it. Anyone know of practical alternatives to the Harrier at this junction?
Although some might quibble with certain aspects of the RAN's equipment purchases recently ( anyone want a super SeaSprite that doesn't work? ) the trend has been to spend what it takes to get quality platforms etc available. The Adelaide ( Oliver Hazzard Perry ) class frigates are getting VLS ESSM, the last of the ANZAC frigates has been delivered, we're almost at the point of selecting for production three AW/AEGIS destroyers and two amphibs and a new class of armed patrol vessels is coming into service. Australian defence spending is on a robust trend that the opposition, should they gain government in the upcoming elections, is unlikely to alter. Heck, we just agreed to A$6 billiion for some Super Hornets that we shouldn't need!!
So the real issue with the RAN having a CV/CVs, and by that I am stressing "fixed wing aviation", is the political will and commitment, not finance or need.
On the other hand, there are a LOT of other things that the ADF also needs!!
Just some thoughts.
Jonathan
|
The deal was also to include some Sea Harriers frs1's and I know that some training had taken place in the flight simulator (harrier) at RNAS Yeolviton (sea harrier base) with members from the RAAF, so puting 2+2 together sounds like the harriers were going to be flown by the RAAF on the the former Invincible which I believe was going to be called HMAS Sydney.
take care
Jeff