|
The col seems to be of the opinion
1) Moscow could be taken only if the germans had not been diverted to Kiev as they were historically
2) Moscow was a huge railway hub. ALL the main lines passed through it. The loss of Moscow would have in essence cut the three main theater off from one another and prevented Stalin from shifting reserves.
3) The Russians had as of yet not got the additional divisions they would in December.
4) The industry was as of yet not transferred to the Urals.
How do those arguements line up?
__________________
"Any relations in a social order will endure if there is infused into them some of that spirit of human sympathy, which qualifies life for immortality." ~ George William Russell
|