|
I guess you'll are right!
But at the same, organisizing what one needs is of the prime importance as a general...so thats one thing that goes his way.
There were so many others like Monty...Wingate for one; who were always getting more than what they needed, but were still called good generals!
I dont get it.
Lastly, with respect to the Indian Generals, I loved the way Gen. Sen lead his troops in '47(I have not read up on any other operation otherwise, so am not wise enough to judge other generals from the other wars).
From what I read about Timmy, I thought he was a good troops commander at a smaller level like that of a Battalion , but bigger than that he was not good enough. In J&K ops he was just not ruthless enough to pester his brigade commaders to push thier men forward.
(LT and Ray, I'd like to know your views on the latter part of my post!)
If I have made any gramatical errors, pardon me...time is of the premium and i may not have corrected them!
__________________
"To every man upon this earth, Death cometh soon or late;
And how can a man die better; Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his father; And the temples of his gods."
|