I despise anti-Americanism and this punk is another one. It's bigotry, pure and simple, and toads like him ALWAYS have to find a target for their petty little hatreds.
Usually, guys like this are racists. I imagine he is one of those too, hinting darkly about the Americans' best friend Ariel Sharon and our Zionist press, blahblahblah. But he's combined his racist antipathy with a big helping of anti-American spew. I loathe a creature like this, and everybody else, should, too.
To take as an example ONE of his posts:
Quote:
|
Carter administartion gave the green light to saddam to invade Iran .. hoping that the turmoil or revolution and wat will somehow weaken the new anti-american government in Iran. You are correct in assuming that US did not provide weapons to Iraq: but UK, France and USSR did quite a bit.
|
But
TheChosenOne's point, explicity made, was that the
US armed Saddam. We didn't, and that's what I said.
Furthermore, the Carter administration, feckless as it was, didn't 'green light' Saddam to invade Iran, which, it should be remembered, was a thug regime that had committed one of the worst examples of uncivilized behavior at the international level: they had seized American personnel and property during their crime, and stop that fukkin' tap-dance about the CIA restoring the Shah, because that's totally irrelevant.
Quote:
|
But believe me that US did its bid and quite bid to support Iraq in everyway they could. Not only that most of Iraqi intelligence was performed via US satellites and I might even add that US did took a side in 1987-88, or I should say Saddam achieved what he wanted when he started attacking Iranian oil shipments, knowing that it would force Iran to strike back which inturn would bring in the superpowers in.
|
Well, I dam' well hope we would have supported Iraq against Iran, because the Iranian delaration of war against the US means that there are CONSEQUENCES for such a rash act. Nothing for any American or any unbiased observer to be ashamed about there.
Quote:
|
Wha ... ?? the grossest violation was when CIA toppled a democratically elected government in 1953 and install a dictator. The Iranian revolution was a 'blow back' of that operation.
|
Absolutely. But do NOT try to sell the Iranian Revolution as the inheritors of that government that was deposed; they're not. So cry me a river about it, but it is NO EXCUSE for behaving like jungle creatures 25 years on.
Quote:
|
incorrect ... the Prime Minister of iran in that time was Dr. Bazargan a 70 year old engineer who had served in the Free French during WWII. He resigned almost immediatly after the hostage taking.
|
No, dumbass, I meant Iran's CURRENT President. He was one of the 'student leaders' (read: thug) that stormed the US Embassy in one of the most outrageous acts imaginable. We oew him a debt of honor that I hope one day will be paid back in the only currency he understands.
Quote:
|
I am not sure if the concept of revolution and the chaos that usually causes is familiar to you Americans. But believe or not things like this do happen.
|
NOW we see your rank chauvanism on display. Yeah, we know a bit about revolution ourselves, so knock off the smarmy superiority act, you greasy little wog bastard.
Quote:
|
But if you feel like using that to strength your anti-iranian stance .. feel free to do so.
|
And I do NOT need your permission to bring up one or another topic to strengthen ANY point I care to make, either, so you can cram that up your ass.
Quote:
|
Infact it was only after the hostage were taken that Khomeini realized of the importance and therefore kept the hostages and made demands.
|
In fact, that's as clear an admission as I've ever seen that you think it was the right thing to do, seizing an embassy and it's diplomats in order to 'make demands'.
You're no different from the howling mob of rank criminals that committed the act in the first place, if you support it, even now, even as you live in the West, where, by the way, we don't DO things like that, nor send to their deaths children and the retarded and pregnant women and anybody else that can be gulled into killing masses of innocent people for your horrible god.
Quote:
|
very funny ... the sunni insurgenncy is financed primarly by Saudi Arabia and Jordan ,, Iran does finances the Shia factions. I believe most of the killings is done by the sunni insurgenncy that is against the Shia-led majority.
|
I was speaking about the unending flow of IEDs and EFPs that come in over the Iranian border, with full knowledge of the criminally insane leadership in Iran. I continue to lose part of my military family to those indisciminate weapons every day, so don't you DARE try to minimize Iranian involvement with it, or so help me, I will fly to Canada and beat you down, you filthy insect.
Quote:
|
since when waging proxy wars has not been on purpose ??? .. and like i said before Iran is on the side Shia not the sunni insuregency. Ofcourse you Americans or so into your FOX news that the concept of Saudi financing of sunni insurgency is too alien for you. How could it be??? they are our allies??
|
Us Americans and our Fox News...again, I just have to say you can suck my dick, you shitty little viper. I understand this conflict FAR better than you EVER will, and the Iranians are the Bad Guys. WE, the United States of America, are the Good Guys. You want to denigrate us; you want to defend them. That makes you an enemy, too.
Which is why I despise you. Not because you're Iranian, I don't care about that, which I expect is an alien concept to you, bigot that YOU are. But you dislike Americans simply BECAUSE we're Americans, and you make all sorts of unfounded claims about us. Well, I'm calling you out on it, punk.
Quote:
|
Is insulting other's nationality is allowed on this forum? .... is this a white supermacy forum? ..... will I be banned if I say that the only Animals are the animals that lauched an unprovoked-invasion of another sovergien nation in 2003.
|
You missed the point, idiot. I was saying anybody that would do what was done to our embassy, or anybody that supports it (which apparently includes YOU) is an animal.
As for your claim the Iraq liberation was unprovoked, well, it would fit nicely in YOUR worldview, but that happens to be 180 degrees out from reality. There was LOTS of provocation. You're just not up on your history, that's all.
Quote:
|
no the war started in 1953 ... but ofcourse you - an American - see things from a bigoted and superior point of view.
|
Fuk you, dickhead. I'm not taking your crap, and nobody else's either. Just as racism isn't tolerated anymore, I'm not putting up with this throw-away, drive-by slap at an entire country - MY country - because you're a hateful little rat. It is no different from racism, and while you're NEVER going to be able to reason this out on your own, you're no better than what you accused me of being when you failed to comprehend that I was saying.
I cannot stand people like you, and I won't tolerate them any more.
Don't bother replying; you're on 'Ignore'.
Low-rent moron.
