View Single Post
Old 01-24-2007, 07:39 AM   #33 (permalink)
awangmamat
Regular
 
awangmamat's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-21-06
Location: 101° East
Posts: 64
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Francois View Post
Over the Spratleys (and about every ground or sea claimed by the PCC), China has stated a definite status of non-negociability.

And they will deal with the issues one at a time when they feel confortable enough.

Just see what they did with Vietnamese islands in 1974 and 1988.
Absolutely. And I would say that the reason the Philippines is "jointly" developing their offshore assets with China is because they do not possess the means to enforce their sovereignty. Whether a revival in the Japanese military might serve as a surrogate to this current lack of ability for various East Asian littoral states is debatable. I have yet to see any indication of an agreement within the Japanese body politic that it is in their interest to do so. However, a revival would certainly free American military resources for this role.

Last edited by awangmamat : 01-24-2007 at 07:41 AM.
awangmamat is offline   Reply With Quote