Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut
You took out your frustration on the Colonel, someone with far more knowledge of military history and politics, just because you don't agree with his views. That was just uncalled for. He was just trying to explain to you why India was not and probably will not take a permanant seat with veto power on the SC. You and Tronic had the same view, but he made it a lot more logical and less emotional argument. Throwing a temper tantrum here won't get you far. Logic and reasoning will get you more respect.
|
Right. I did'nt take out ANY frustration. I was just putting my points forward. He claimed everything is BS that i said. Which i factually pointed out was NOT. I never claimed anything that was BS. I have a right to not agree with anyones views. I have a right to feel affronted if i present ceredible evidence and am ignored. It's not right to tickle someone and then back out. Thats what the colonel did. I don't think someone who denies tens of millions died under Mao of starvation has much knowledge or fact to back it up. Either put up the facts on the table or up for a poll.
As for you. You have no business calling me stupid or ignorant. Back it up with some facts. I will wait. And i mentioned my criteria initially why i think India should have been in the UNSC. Why India never signed the NPT. In response you raised the WW2 issue. I only tried to defend the fact that India contributed heavily in the WW2 effort.
I am NOT going to be defensive of this.
Please APOLOGIZE for using offensive personal terms against me. That would be gentlemanly. I do not warrant that. Or back up the statement with FACT!