Quote:
Originally Posted by Trooth
I was not saying that the building fell within their footprint on the day so mch as pointing out that part of their design is to facilitate controlled demolition. Clearly this wasn't controlled. But a lot of conspiracy theorists try to make capital out of "well they collapsed so neatly" and, whilst it wasn't actually that neat, it was broadly vertical and the design was contributry.
That and the massive vertical loadings of course.
|
Understood Trooth, I was just addressing the general conspiracy theory that "they fell in their own footprint therefore it must have been controlled demolition" blah blah. Highsea put it much better than I
