Quote:
Originally Posted by srirangan
You better work on your comprehension skills. Assuming something not implied won't get you far.
Vaiko is clearly associated with my next sentence which talks about the "likes of Vaiko's" who fail to put up a successful lobbying show despite the odds being stacked so heavily in their favour.
Now it doesn't take a Harvard Degree to figure out that I did not say what you implied onto me.
|
oh really? heh this is funny u said that ur next sentence was explanation to ur first sentence in that post right? ok lets take another look at this and see who is lacking comprehension skills.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay
Thats oh so 60's thought. There is no so called free tamil state movement, the party which wanted a free state is a coalition member in the center and ruler of the state and its independent state is not in their agenda anymore.
Any talks of a separate state by any individual will invite a death bell to him and his party.
|
you said
Quote:
Originally Posted by srirangan
Absolutely. And that's the problem with the likes of Vaiko. They have a potentially very influential lobby, and they screw it up thanks to their infinite
wisdom.
|
first sentence
Quote:
Originally Posted by srirangan
Absolutely. And that's the problem with the likes of Vaiko.
|
lets dissect this
this sentence follows this
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay
Any talks of a separate state by any individual will invite a death bell to him and his party.
|
so if we are to look at it it will be as follows
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay
Any talks of a separate state by any individual will invite a death bell to him and his party.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by srirangan
Absolutely. And that's the problem with the likes of Vaiko.
|
BUT! u are saying that this is not the way tis meant to be. have u heard of a way of writing in which u say "absolutely" to a previous line, and then claim thats to be actually tagged with a following line?
its funny that u seem to cast doubt on my comprehension process while its plain obvious that if what u claimed about ur sentence structure is true, then u have serious deficiencies when it comes to creating sentences let alone comprehension
and as u claimed earlier, this doesn't need a Harvard education
