View Single Post
Old 06-19-2004, 15:59 PM   #35 (permalink)
roshan
Patron
 
roshan's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-30-03
Posts: 240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lunatock
Lots more to consider than just the Katana and the European Bastard Sword. Knight Swords and Knight Armor for example. They depended on brute strength since the swords and armor were so heavy. And when knights fought the objective was to knock your opponent flat on his back.

And the different types of weapons & tactics. Let's say castle or house warfare. Unlike Knights, samurai would use bows & arrows at medium to close range.
And you ever been inside any Japanese buildings? Not quite as spacious as buildings in other countries. Which would suck for fully suited knights and most of thier weapons. Samurai could just unsheath some Wakazashi's, which were made for indoor fighting. And odds are the knights would have to use daggers, as most of thier other weapons would be too big & clumsy, considering the limited space they'd have in a Japanese fortress.
1. I am not sure what you mean by knight swords. Knights typically used bastard swords or two handed swords. The katana is basically the japanese version of the bastard sword.

2. Knights not only had bows but crossbows too, which were simpler to use.

3. What exactly makes a fully suited knight more clumsy then a fully suited samurai? Both knights and samurai used plate armor.

4. If samurais could use wakizashis, the knight could also use a short sword.
roshan is offline   Reply With Quote