World Affairs Board - View Single Post - What are your thoughts on the 2k22 Tunguska M-1?

hound · 08-24-2006, 23:12 PM

'SA-2, SA-3, SA-6, and SA-8'

To be fair SA-2 and SA-6 belong to the early 1970s so they stood no chance against top of the line USAF items in 1991 and so on.

True S-300 would not stop USAF but sure can take a good toll especially when it can also shoot down stealths so it will be one long campaign.

'And A-10s operated as low as 50 feet at times. The Tornados were also exclusively used in a low altitude runway cratering role early in the war as well'

These were brought into picture once missiles were all shot out so 'fly as you will' environment existed.

08-24-2006, 23:12 PM	#20 (permalink)
hound Banished Join Date: 08-20-06 Posts: 90	'SA-2, SA-3, SA-6, and SA-8' To be fair SA-2 and SA-6 belong to the early 1970s so they stood no chance against top of the line USAF items in 1991 and so on. True S-300 would not stop USAF but sure can take a good toll especially when it can also shoot down stealths so it will be one long campaign. 'And A-10s operated as low as 50 feet at times. The Tornados were also exclusively used in a low altitude runway cratering role early in the war as well' These were brought into picture once missiles were all shot out so 'fly as you will' environment existed. Last edited by hound : 08-24-2006 at 23:15 PM.