View Single Post
Old 05-17-2004, 19:25 PM   #10 (permalink)
Confed999
Staff Emeritus
 
Confed999's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-10-03
Location: Florida
Posts: 10,681
Country:
Send a message via AIM to Confed999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trooth
those WMD are now potentially scattered around a much larger region in less controlled hands than under Saddam. Something that is the polar opposite of the WMD related aims of this war.
They had WMD, that's a fact, what happened to them is the question. Your statement is a possible scenario. The WMD related aims of the war was to stop Saddam from giving the weapons away or using them on his neighbors, the UN gave him years to do either.
__________________
No man is free until all men are free - John Hossack
I agree completely with this Administration’s goal of a regime change in Iraq-John Kerry
even if that enforcement is mostly at the hands of the United States, a right we retain even if the Security Council fails to act-John Kerry
He may even miscalculate and slide these weapons off to terrorist groups to invite them to be a surrogate to use them against the United States. It’s the miscalculation that poses the greatest threat-John Kerry
Confed999 is offline   Reply With Quote