ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > 2008 US Presidential Election
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 04-16-2008, 16:58 PM   #16 (permalink)
Dreadnought
Senior Contributor
 
Dreadnought's Avatar
 
Join Date: 05-12-05
Posts: 4,968
Country:
Bush did the right thing not the popular thing the right thing by going headlong into the WOT. Now the rest of the world needs to decide where they stand on the issues. Our allies have been good to us but the road is long and we cant go it alone. This effects all nations not just ours.
__________________
Fortitude.....The strength to persist...The courage to endure.
Dreadnought is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 17:23 PM   #17 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,662
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
Too much of what he says is GWB redux from tax policy, trade policy, Iraq etc et al

Why would I want a continuation of this? HNN Poll: 61% of Historians Rate the Bush Presidency Worst

i liked the John McCain of the 90s.
I was watching Red Eye w/Greg Gutfeld last night... they had a poll in which 98% of history professors rated the Bush presidency unfavorably.
__________________
The Buck Stops Here
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 17:25 PM   #18 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 7,727
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
I was watching Red Eye w/Greg Gutfeld last night... they had a poll in which 98% of history professors rated the Bush presidency unfavorably.
1) I love Gutfeld's stuff when he posts on the HuffPo. Funny guy.

2) That's like 98% of pot smokers deciding they like to smoke pot.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 17:34 PM   #19 (permalink)
Shek
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,244
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
1) I love Gutfeld's stuff when he posts on the HuffPo. Funny guy.

2) That's like 98% of pot smokers deciding they like to smoke pot.

-dale
The other 2%?
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2008, 17:36 PM   #20 (permalink)
Ironduke
Burgomaster
 
Join Date: 08-02-03
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6,662
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
1) I love Gutfeld's stuff when he posts on the HuffPo. Funny guy.

2) That's like 98% of pot smokers deciding they like to smoke pot.

-dale
He's done with the Huffington Post... now he's on at 2am on Fox News. I think his show is one of the most hilarious I've ever seen.
Ironduke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 06:23 AM   #21 (permalink)
Shipwreck
Usual suspect...
Senior Contributor
 
Shipwreck's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-07-06
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Posts: 1,605
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreadnought View Post
McCain has not always agreed with Bush over alot of subjects.
Yup. Torture for instance.

Which is not surprising. While one was a POW in Hanoi, the other one was using his family connections to gain admission to the ANG and avoid serving in Vietnam.
__________________
"Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9)

Last edited by Shipwreck : 04-17-2008 at 06:36 AM.
Shipwreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 12:26 PM   #22 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,577
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shek View Post
The other 2%?
They are forced to smoke pot due to "medical conditions."
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2008, 12:46 PM   #23 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 7,727
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shek View Post
The other 2%?
They forgot.

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 15:00 PM   #24 (permalink)
Ryan Bailey
Military Professional
 
Ryan Bailey's Avatar
 
Join Date: 09-25-07
Location: Megalopolis, US
Posts: 135
Country:
Friends, this may seem a stretch but I will venture a prediction:

In short the American people for the past century and a half have elected Republicans to clean up and close out unpopular wars which progress into symbols of Washingtonian Wasteage & Federal Inaction, Civil War/ Reconstruction, The Great War, Korea, Viet Nam inclusive.

McCain could benefit from focusing on the lack of leadership that the 2007-present Democrat Congress (which controls the Army & Navy 100% constitutionally) has displayed. At present our country has essentially no course of action for the next phase of the GWOT, perhaps Sen. McCain could present one around which the people may rally.

This would be in keeping with tradition, especially as the GWOT degrades in a Bushcentric assault with momentum into a Pelosicentric defence with attrition.
__________________
"If we will not be governed by God then we will be ruled by tyrants" -William Penn
Ryan Bailey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 15:14 PM   #25 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 8,577
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryan Bailey View Post
Friends, this may seem a stretch but I will venture a prediction:

In short the American people for the past century and a half have elected Republicans to clean up and close out unpopular wars which progress into symbols of Washingtonian Wasteage & Federal Inaction, Civil War/ Reconstruction, The Great War, Korea, Viet Nam inclusive.

McCain could benefit from focusing on the lack of leadership that the 2007-present Democrat Congress (which controls the Army & Navy 100% constitutionally) has displayed. At present our country has essentially no course of action for the next phase of the GWOT, perhaps Sen. McCain could present one around which the people may rally.

This would be in keeping with tradition, especially as the GWOT degrades in a Bushcentric assault with momentum into a Pelosicentric defence with attrition.
That maybe true. However those wars were started by democrats. This current war was started by a republican.

All wars the US was involved in over the last century were started by either the democrats or a Bush.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2008, 18:11 PM   #26 (permalink)
Zemco
Banished
Regular
 
Join Date: 03-26-08
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironduke View Post
I was watching Red Eye w/Greg Gutfeld last night... they had a poll in which 98% of history professors rated the Bush presidency unfavorably.
It's the money.

The standard was to wait until a president died before reporting on their historical impact, and even those who died in office or early than usual it was common to wait at least 12 years to assess the historical impact. That all changed around the time of Kennedy/Johnson/Nixon, and now it's a rush to get books out on the market to make money.
Zemco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 05:32 AM   #27 (permalink)
ba1025
Banished
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-04-08
Posts: 287
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
That maybe true. However those wars were started by democrats. This current war was started by a republican.

All wars the US was involved in over the last century were started by either the democrats or a Bush.
AMERICANS didn't start world war 2 or world war 1. The got involved well after the fact. Which republican was elected to end ww1 or ww2? perhaps the reasons the other wars had such sloppy endings is we had republican leadrship? Of course not. Woudl we of ever let China backed NK invade and conquer SK? Of course not. Should we have committed ourselves to Vietnam, Gulf 1 and gulf 2?

Should we of tried to fullfill our SEATO obligations? Should we of done nothing when a country we had agreed to come to the aid of was invaded and conquered? partisans love to blame Johnson and Kennedy for Vietnam but the truth is our Vietnam policy was a failure the moment we allowed them to enter SEATO under Eisenhower to the day we left.

Americans enter wars...the one in Iraq is no different most Americans in both parties initially supported it. Were we lied to...i think Bush was as honest with the Congress in 02 as Johnson was with the congress in 65

if the country wants to stay in Iraq for 100 or how many years it will stay. no one can make us leave but us. If the citizens of the country want to leave then we will leave. The government may resist the move but eventually if that is the will of the people that's want will happen. That's the great thing about America.

I think McCain may be in trouble because of the State parties. Some will run thinly veiled racial attacks on Obama because they will play to a portion of the base. The problem is in swing states they will work against McCain. He says it isn't me as long as he likes but he will be connected to them. Stuff like Wright said is evil but it isn't that much worse than what Falwell or Robertson have said and they got invited to the Whitehouse till the end. Trying to link Obama to stuff he didn't say is going to blow up outside of the south. The party ofwhite protestant bankers and Texas oil men isn't going to have a bright future in a brown country. Even Karl Rove saw that and tried to get the party to redirect in 06. regardless of what anyone thinks of him the man knows politics
ba1025 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2008, 09:59 AM   #28 (permalink)
Stan187
WAB BOUNCER
Senior Contributor
 
Stan187's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-06
Posts: 2,148
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ba1025 View Post
AMERICANS didn't start world war 2 or world war 1. The got involved well after the fact. Which republican was elected to end ww1 or ww2? perhaps the reasons the other wars had such sloppy endings is we had republican leadrship? Of course not. Woudl we of ever let China backed NK invade and conquer SK? Of course not. Should we have committed ourselves to Vietnam, Gulf 1 and gulf 2?

Should we of tried to fullfill our SEATO obligations? Should we of done nothing when a country we had agreed to come to the aid of was invaded and conquered? partisans love to blame Johnson and Kennedy for Vietnam but the truth is our Vietnam policy was a failure the moment we allowed them to enter SEATO under Eisenhower to the day we left.

Americans enter wars...the one in Iraq is no different most Americans in both parties initially supported it. Were we lied to...i think Bush was as honest with the Congress in 02 as Johnson was with the congress in 65

if the country wants to stay in Iraq for 100 or how many years it will stay. no one can make us leave but us. If the citizens of the country want to leave then we will leave. The government may resist the move but eventually if that is the will of the people that's want will happen. That's the great thing about America.

I think McCain may be in trouble because of the State parties. Some will run thinly veiled racial attacks on Obama because they will play to a portion of the base. The problem is in swing states they will work against McCain. He says it isn't me as long as he likes but he will be connected to them. Stuff like Wright said is evil but it isn't that much worse than what Falwell or Robertson have said and they got invited to the Whitehouse till the end. Trying to link Obama to stuff he didn't say is going to blow up outside of the south. The party ofwhite protestant bankers and Texas oil men isn't going to have a bright future in a brown country. Even Karl Rove saw that and tried to get the party to redirect in 06. regardless of what anyone thinks of him the man knows politics
Speaking of sloppy endings...
__________________
In Iran people belive pepsi stands for pay each penny save israel. -urmomma158
The Russian Navy is still a threat, but only to those unlucky enough to be Russian sailors.-highsea
Stan187 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 18:36 PM   #29 (permalink)
ba1025
Banished
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-04-08
Posts: 287
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shek View Post
How was he forced? He campaigned on Medicare Part D. A GOP Congress allowed the growth of earmarks (although it takes two to tango on this one). You can't hold him accountable for the growth of "mandatory" entitlement spending, but you certainly can zing him for the growth of non-defense discretionary spending.
It's called revisionist History. how many bills did Bush veto before 2006? I beleive if a republican President had wanted to tamp down the earmarks of a republican congress he could of. I dont think he had the will. 9/11 had nothing to do with him gutting revenue and spending like a stuck pig. He didnt know how to say no to a spending bill till 2007. Remember the return to big farm subsidies? Remeber the massive payout to tobacco farmers who onavg had a net wealth of 600k when they got their govt welfare checks?
ba1025 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2008, 18:41 PM   #30 (permalink)
ba1025
Banished
Patron
 
Join Date: 04-04-08
Posts: 287
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lars View Post
Anything to avoid a fight that keeps you from the main one ;^)

Kinda fun to go back and look at his first budget. Called for reducing the national debt by $2 trillion. Ah, those were the days.

Doesn't even get a mention in this one, btw.
Projecting reducing the deficit whilst handing out massive taax cuts and increasing non discretionary spending is BS. Here's a mention. All his defict projections for the next ten years that show it coming down DONT include extending ANY of his taxcuts or fixxing the AMT. Did that original projection have his original taxcuts being extended...which they were...NO. You know why they were only remp taxcuts and need to keep being extended? Because if they put them on the books going out into the future they become unjustifiable in the face of the massive deficts they will continue to bring.
ba1025 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk troung 2008 US Presidential Election 5 02-23-2008 01:31 AM
McCain at CPAC Ironduke 2008 US Presidential Election 1 02-07-2008 23:30 PM
McCain has been more wrong than most troung 2008 US Presidential Election 2 02-06-2008 01:06 AM
Schwarzenegger backs McCain Ironduke 2008 US Presidential Election 1 01-31-2008 17:26 PM
Clinton vs. McCain Julie Political Discussions 30 03-15-2006 18:11 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:04 PM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8