ELECTION 2008 | The Pub | The Field Mess | The Staff College | Bookmark WAB



Go Back   World Affairs Board > General Forums > 2008 US Presidential Election
Register FAQ WAB RSS Feed Forum GuidelinesMembers List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Greetings, and welcome to the World Affairs Board!

The World Affairs Board is one of the premier forums for the discussion of the pressing geopolitical issues of our time. Topics include foreign & defense policy, international security, military developments, weapons proliferation, terrorism, international strategic affairs, and politics. Our membership includes many from military, defense industry, and government backgrounds with expert knowledge on a wide range of topics. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so why not register a World Affairs Board account and join our community today?
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 02-26-2008, 14:25 PM   #16 (permalink)
entropy
Senior Reader
Senior Contributor
 
entropy's Avatar
 
Join Date: 03-19-07
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,628
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by gunnut View Post
Heard a new term to describe the Obama cult today.

Obamanation.
Obaminable, isn't it?
__________________
If memory serves...

entropy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 19:18 PM   #17 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by entropy View Post
Obaminable, isn't it?
If there was a wretching smiley, I would be using it right now. The writers strike is over! Spare us!
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 01:31 AM   #18 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by rj1 View Post
The people younger than the Baby Boomers have realized that the Baby Boomers have f***ed this country up, and this is the younger generation trying to grab power away from the older generation. So naturally the younger generation that supports Obama sees this election as a larger-than-life issue. The Baby Boomers should be used to it, they did it themselves in the sixties and seventies.
Correction, the socialists have f'ed up this country, doesn't matter young or old.

If the younger generation really wants to fix this problem, they would analyze Obama's campaign rhetoric and figure out it's pretty much the same old socialist medicine packaged in a shiny new box.

Go to Obama's site: Barack Obama | Change We Can Believe In | Economy

Look at those issues he listed point by point.

Quote:
Provide a Tax Cut for Working Families: Obama will restore fairness to the tax code and provide 150 million workers the tax relief they need. Obama will create a new "Making Work Pay" tax credit of up to $500 per person, or $1,000 per working family. The "Making Work Pay" tax credit will completely eliminate income taxes for 10 million Americans.

Why all these Mickey Mouse "tax credits?" Why not just straight up lower the tax rate?

Simplify Tax Filings for Middle Class Americans: Obama will dramatically simplify tax filings so that millions of Americans will be able to do their taxes in less than five minutes. Obama will ensure that the IRS uses the information it already gets from banks and employers to give taxpayers the option of pre-filled tax forms to verify, sign and return. Experts estimate that the Obama proposal will save Americans up to 200 million total hours of work and aggravation and up to $2 billion in tax preparer fees.

If you really want simple tax code, go with a flat tax or national sales tax. A national sales tax will encourage savings too.

Fight for Fair Trade: Obama will fight for a trade policy that opens up foreign markets to support good American jobs. He will use trade agreements to spread good labor and environmental standards around the world and stand firm against agreements like the Central American Free Trade Agreement that fail to live up to those important benchmarks. Obama will also pressure the World Trade Organization to enforce trade agreements and stop countries from continuing unfair government subsidies to foreign exporters and nontariff barriers on U.S. exports.

So poor countries should have impossibly high environmental standards like us? Or else what? Tariffs?

Amend the North American Free Trade Agreement: Obama believes that NAFTA and its potential were oversold to the American people. Obama will work with the leaders of Canada and Mexico to fix NAFTA so that it works for American workers.

He doesn't say what's wrong with it....

Improve Transition Assistance: To help all workers adapt to a rapidly changing economy, Obama would update the existing system of Trade Adjustment Assistance by extending it to service industries, creating flexible education accounts to help workers retrain, and providing retraining assistance for workers in sectors of the economy vulnerable to dislocation before they lose their jobs.

Spending government money to look for jobs that otherwise people should look for themselves.

I can go down the list and ask questions on every single one of his proposals. All of them are the same. It offers a little bit of government money for a specific portion of the population. In effect, he's buying votes with tax dollars. He's not making any tough decisions to fix our problems. He's just dumping more money onto the problems without fixing the root cause.

Running a nation is like running a household. You don't have unlimited budget to buy everything you want to keep everyone happy. We have to make choices. Buy that big screen I always wanted or take a vacation? Fix the house or buy a car for junior? Retire early or pay for kid's college tuition?

We make these choices everyday. Why can't our government?
__________________
"Only Nixon can go to China." -- Old Vulcan proverb.
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 01:32 AM   #19 (permalink)
gunnut
Senior Contributor
 
gunnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-27-06
Location: DPRK, Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Posts: 9,365
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by entropy View Post
Obaminable, isn't it?
Only if he's the snowman...
gunnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 06:14 AM   #20 (permalink)
astralis
Foreign Service
Moderator
Lei Feng Protege
 
Join Date: 08-23-05
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,944
Country:
Army general: 'No reason to doubt' Obama's story - CNN.com

interesting- i thought it was a bit implausible myself, but...
__________________
Never let the future disturb you. You will meet it, if you have to, with the same weapons of reason which today arm you against the present.

-Marcus Aurelius, Meditations
astralis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 08:21 AM   #21 (permalink)
Bigfella
Senior Contributor
 
Bigfella's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 785
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by astralis View Post
Army general: 'No reason to doubt' Obama's story - CNN.com

interesting- i thought it was a bit implausible myself, but...

I think its pretty clear that General Casey is either the biggest liar or the most credulous dupe. Or perhaps he's just an idiot unfit for high command.

Right?
__________________
Win nervously lose tragically - Reds C C
Bigfella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 09:49 AM   #22 (permalink)
Shek
Military Professional
Moderator
 
Join Date: 02-23-05
Location: Krblachistan
Posts: 7,629
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
I think its pretty clear that General Casey is either the biggest liar or the most credulous dupe. Or perhaps he's just an idiot unfit for high command.

Right?
Bigfella,

A closer reading of GEN Casey's remarks is in order, as there is no context to Obama's remarks and the broadbrush stroke of article linked by Astralis is weak.

Obama's beating a drum that is over a Presidential election old, and what GEN Casey states clearly shows that the case being made by Obama is an incorrect extrapolation. I'm sure the headlines are a reaction to GOP reaction over the remarks, so from that perpecitve it is a fair headline, but in terms of the specific issue, the headlines miss the story that Obama's conclusions based on this case is just flat wrong.

Quote:
General: Obama's Story Is Believable - Examiner.com

"I have no reason to doubt what it is the captain said," Casey said. "This was 2003 and 2004, almost four and a half years ago. We acknowledge and all worked together to correct the deficiencies that we saw in that period, not only in Afghanistan but in Iraq. It was a period that we worked our way through."

***

Casey said the Army has purposefully not tried to seek out the captain individually. But he did contact the platoon's brigade commander, which belonged to the 10th Mountain Division, and reviewed the division's readiness reports.

Casey said the brigade was manned at 100 percent during its entire deployment, but that it is possible a particular platoon within the brigade was not manned at the desired level.

"There may have been some spot shortages in spare parts and ammunition," he said. "But the commander said that there were never a shortage of ammunition that impacted the units ability to accomplish its mission."
From my experience, I have never heard of a rifle platoon split up for separate deployments. I have heard of units that deployed short of men because of the timing of folks ending their service, which makes them non-deployable (unless stop-lossed, which based on the time frame here, the stop-loss had been temporarily lifted), but that would also lead to the conclusion that Obama's case that Iraq hurt this unit's fight in Afghanistan as being incorrect. I've heard of specialty skills platoons being split up, but that's because they are designed to be split for actual operations.

Folks were correct to jump on Obama's remarks as they don't pass the initial smell test. GEN Casey's remarks could simply be a way to diffuse the situation and remove the military from the middle of a partisan fight, while preventing the officer in question from becoming a partisan target when it simply could have been a misunderstanding by Obama (e.g., maybe the platoon was short due to end of term non-deployables, but Obama misunderstood and made a misstatement).

I decline your false dichotomy
__________________
"So little pains do the vulgar take in the investigation of truth, accepting readily the first story that comes to hand." Thucydides 1.20.3
Shek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 12:25 PM   #23 (permalink)
Albany Rifles
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Albany Rifles's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-27-07
Location: Prince George, VA
Posts: 1,020
Country:
Splitting of platoons

Shek

10 MD and 82 ABN DIV did provide squads to USASOC to provide extra firepower for direct action during DS/DS, OEF and OIF.

COBRA 2 disusses as does some books on Gulf War

Not a regualr occurence but did happen

Rangers get tapped more for that, though.
__________________
"Always with the negative waves Moriarty, always with the negative waves." TSGT Oddball, Tank Commander
Albany Rifles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 15:37 PM   #24 (permalink)
dalem
Lord High Hullabalooster
Senior Contributor
 
dalem's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-23-04
Location: Columbia Heights, MN
Posts: 8,323
Country:
I know I'm just a stinky civvy, but I wish Obama and some of his a$$clown followers would simply read Atkinson's "The Day of Battle". Maybe a few hundred pages of a truly poorly-managed Anzio campaign and the problems and casualties that resulted from it would help reset expectations where warfare is concerned.

Then again, probably not.

I mean seriously. A platoon got deployed (-) and from what I've seen confirmed, was short a vehicle and had to use a couple Russian HMGs on the ones they did have. Even if it's true, boo-frikkin'-hoo.

What's happened to us as a nation?

-dale
dalem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 16:58 PM   #25 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalem View Post
I know I'm just a stinky civvy, but I wish Obama and some of his a$$clown followers would simply read Atkinson's "The Day of Battle". Maybe a few hundred pages of a truly poorly-managed Anzio campaign and the problems and casualties that resulted from it would help reset expectations where warfare is concerned.

Then again, probably not.

I mean seriously. A platoon got deployed (-) and from what I've seen confirmed, was short a vehicle and had to use a couple Russian HMGs on the ones they did have. Even if it's true, boo-frikkin'-hoo.

What's happened to us as a nation?

-dale
Well, one of the things that's about to happen to us is we're going to get to choose if we want a thick brick like Obama to lead the world's foremost military power. Great.

He thinks US troops actually had to capture Taleban weapons and ammo in order to fight (and I'm not sure how they'd even go about doing that). Obviously, he's a military idiot, if that's what he believes, and that one fact should absolutely disqualify him in the eyes of a rational voter.

And BigFella, GEN Casey wasn't commenting on what Obama said, and clearly believes. He was saying that the Army captain probably was telling the truth, but Obama didn't understand him. But you and CNN aren't sharp enough about the subject matter to get that part.

Was the Army captain commenting on his short-manned platoon? Possibly, but his missing soldiers weren't 'detailed off' to Iraq. How 'bout the part where he said that he sometimes ran out of stuff waaaaay out there on the last 1,000 kilometers of the worst logistics challenge in the entire universe of military operations? Probably, but whether we had troops in Iraq or Germany or Hawaii, those challenges would've remained absolutely unchanged. And did Obama hear what he wanted to hear, and twist that into his own narrative of how Bush's idiotic Iraq adventure made warfaighting anywhere else on the planet impossible? UNDOUBTEDLY, because the point is to back up his ridiculous claim that, but for Iraq, Afghanistan would be a clone of Switzerland by now, and he thought he had been told this by an Army captain that had 'been there'. What he doesn't understand is that he misunderstood what he'd been truthfully told, and it was his prejudices that allowed - no, actually REQUIRED - him to misunderstand it.

Ah, but YOU think Casey just confirmed that Obama was CORRECT. He didn't. He said that there was no reason to doubt what the CAPTAIN said was correct, and I agree. But CNN jacked up the headline, and you bought the whole bill of goods, too.

Which is why I believe your intellect is mostly a rumor.
__________________
"The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."
- George Orwell

Last edited by Bluesman : 02-28-2008 at 14:01 PM.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 17:00 PM   #26 (permalink)
Bluesman
WAB Bartender
Defense Professional
Military Professional
 
Bluesman's Avatar
 
Join Date: 11-24-04
Location: Vacaville, CA.
Posts: 7,387
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
I think its pretty clear that General Casey is either the biggest liar or the most credulous dupe. Or perhaps he's just an idiot unfit for high command.

Right?
WRONG.

CNN amd yourself, however, are ill-equipped to offer any insight into whether Obama, yourself, Casey or any given Army officer is qualified for anything at all.

Belt up.
Bluesman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 04:39 AM   #27 (permalink)
Bigfella
Senior Contributor
 
Bigfella's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-12-07
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 785
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluesman View Post
Ah, but YOU think Casey just confirmed that Obama was CORRECT. He didn't. He said that there was no reason to doubt what the CAPTAIN said was correct, and I agree. But CNN jacked up the headline, and you bought the whole bill of goods, too.

Which is why I believe your intellect is mostly a rumor.

No. I don't know if Obama was right or not & care even less.

I do think Casey confirmed that you are a self-important windbag. You don't like Obama. Gee, what a shock. So why bother to pretend that you need 'proof', however slight, to back it up? Just write 'I hate Obama' a lot. it will have the same argumentitive value OR keep it up & look like an even bigger goose. No skin off mine.

Of course, GOP voters would have a shred of moral high ground on this issue if they hadn't chosen Bush in 2000.

On the upside, you will be unhappy no matter who wins in November. No doubt you will spend the next few years telling everyone on WAB just how unhappy you are in excruciating detail. I plan to enjoy every moment.

You may think that my intellect is a rumour, but I know that your pomposity is an established fact.
Bigfella is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 08:27 AM   #28 (permalink)
lwarmonger
Military Professional
 
Join Date: 02-08-05
Posts: 1,784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigfella View Post
Of course, GOP voters would have a shred of moral high ground on this issue if they hadn't chosen Bush in 2000.
The Democrats chose Gore... and the more he speaks the gladder I am that he lost. His presidency would have been a disaster.
lwarmonger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 09:41 AM   #29 (permalink)
Mobbme
The Cool Guy
Senior Contributor
 
Mobbme's Avatar
 
Join Date: 10-10-07
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,229
Country:
Obamessiah. How about Obama Bin Laden?



Mobbme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2008, 09:42 AM   #30 (permalink)
T_igger_cs_30
Military Professional
 
T_igger_cs_30's Avatar
 
Join Date: 01-04-07
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,943
Country:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobbme View Post
Obamessiah. How about Obama Bin Laden?

More like Omar Bin Liner
__________________
<img src=http://C:\Documents and Settings\Wayne Smith\My Documents\002...My Pictures border=0 alt= />FEAR NAUGHT

I don't work here ...I am an analyst!
T_igger_cs_30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Rochen is the business hosting sponsor of World Affairs Board and a provider of reseller web hosting services.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC8